![]() I'm pretty sure the access to the storage and screen will be the same. It's the case, the screen, storage and whatever is needed for the Bluetooth to work. The CPU, storage access and RAM etc are all going to be more important than the screen.Īnd the difference in the hardware between the Libra H2O and Libra 2 is pretty small. Then render the next when requested and sends that. The Libra features a 7 inch E Ink Carta HD. there are MANY differences between the two models. But, ereaders render the page and then send that to the screen. The Kobo Libra is the latest generation e-reader and it is going to be available in a week or two. I'd expect the difference to be noticeable if they played a video. But, the way that the ereaders use the screens isn't going to show that. The has been a lot of comments about the Carta 1200 screen being faster. The first part of that is pretty much how I expected it. Note: There are still two images in the reddit link that shows the dark mode screens but for some reason the images refuse to be uploaded here (even after reducing the image sizes) The luminosity was set at 100% in all pictures, and either completely white (knob to the left) or completely yellow (knob all to the right). The Libra H2O is on the left, the Libra 2 is on the right. ![]() So here are pictures comparing them side-by-side : White background with white and yellow light, then black background with white and yellow light. However, the screen doesn't seem all that faster - the refreshes seem to be quicker but when having the same book opened and going forward with the buttons at the same fast pace (like 1-2 pages per second), the Libra 2 would get an edge but then somehow the H2O would catch up. The buttons are a bit better, less clicky, more "roundy" feeling The blacks are infinitely better, very great contrast - I used to invert the screen of my Libra H2O to read in bed, it was working totally alright, but the screen really did improve on this (I now understand why they officially support "Dark mode" on the Libra 2) The lighting is better imo, the yellow/orange tint is much more yellow/orange than before and that's nice I'll have to see if it negatively impacts long reading sessions, but from this I'm pretty sure I won't snap a case on it, I'll rather use a traveling pouch or something The Libra 2 definitely feels more "chunky", like it's heavier and thicker. I haven't had time yet to really use the new Libra 2, but so far I can easily tell a few differences : I thought I'd might as well get the new one, compare and return either one. So I got the Libra H20 less than a month ago : a week after I bought it, Kobo announced the refreshed model. It feels quite similar to reading a book under natural light, thanks in part to the 300DPI resolution, which is the same as a proper paper book.(Libra H2O vs Libra 2 (screen brightness and contrast) - photos) The natural glossiness of the screen gives it away somewhat, but this is a very paper-like display. While the backlighting is nice, one final aspect of the screen worth mentioning is how well it functions with no backlighting. After a surprisingly short amount of time, this becomes second nature to the point you likely won’t even notice yourself adjusting the brightness. Besides, as the device informs you when you first start using it, a simple gesture on the left side of the screen lets you easily adjust the brightness. Unlike certain Kindle models, it won’t automatically adapt to the lighting of your room, but you can easily switch between warm and cool color temperatures in the settings.īrightness isn’t automatic on the Libra 2, which I didn’t mind because this isn’t often desirable on eReaders. ![]() The display is backlit, and the lighting is quite even, without any particularly bright or dark areas, even along the edges of the screen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |